Saddam is Dead; Long Live Saddam
I must admit I was quite surprised at the rapidity with which Saddam Hussein’s death sentence was carried out. I guess it makes sense, though. Delays might’ve given Saddam’s loyalists a chance to take hostages and commit other acts intended to scare the nascent Iraqi government into letting the brutal dictator go.
Will this be good or bad in the long run? I really don’t know. Leaving Saddam alive to rot in prison might have encouraged his sympathizers to commit acts of barbarity in the name of earning his freedom. In death, however, he becomes a martyr around which many insurgents will surely rally. I don’t think any of us can know which course of action came with the higher price tag.
I am against the death penalty. Period. End of story. But that doesn’t mean I have any sympathy for Saddam. He was an evil piece of garbage, a sub-human thug, a smear of filth on the surface of this planet.
Nevertheless, I cannot say with certainty that he leaves the world no poorer for his passing. Because his death may trigger more violence which claims more innocent lives.
December 31st, 2006 at 10:18 pm
I’m pro death penalty. I still think this was wrong, but likely for the wrong reasons. Saddam in prison was possibly a useful tool. Saddam as martyr IS a useful tool. Just not our tool. Our only saving grace here is that Saddam’s supporters are not as religiously extreme or fanatical as some others in the Middle East. Still, his more militant loyalists will likely use this as a rallying point in the same way that we in the West might use a fallen war leader as a symbol on the battlefield.
It could become the Iraqi version of, “get out there and win one for the Gipper!”
January 5th, 2007 at 6:33 pm
Once I found out that he was actually sentenced to death, I figured it wouldn’t take too long. First, it shows the Iraqi people that their Shiny Happy New Government can Get Things Done. Second, it showed that he’s not coming back to power.